Thursday, February 27, 2014

Originalism and the Good Constitution

John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport (Northwestern University, University of San Diego). Originalism and the Good Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013).

"In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities—both its original enactment under Article VII and subsequent Amendments under Article V. A text approved by supermajorities has special value in a democracy because it has unusually wide support and thus tends to maximize the welfare of the greatest number. . . . A fascinating counterfactual they pose is this: had the Supreme Court not interpreted the Constitution so freely, perhaps the nation would have resorted to the Article V amendment process more often and with greater effect."
Originalism and the Good Constitution book jacket.